Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodsucking Zombies From Outer Space


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 23:52, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Bloodsucking Zombies From Outer Space

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable band, with no little to no coverage in reliable sources. Unable to find any mentions or reviews, only coverage appears to be in social networking sites and last.fm type sites. TN X Man 16:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC, and the reference listed as "New York Times" is actually just an about.com guide's review, which not only fails WP:RS but seems to be an attempt to mislead readers about the band's lack of mainstream press coverage. DreamGuy (talk) 16:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It's your rights, but try to explain (for yourselves at least) why other psychobilly band's pages are still here? A LOT of pages without any references. With less "notable". But they are here. The rules have been changed? Look at this genre band's list and kill all other psychobilly pages, without any references and non-notable. It's the genre of not so popular (as Madonna) bands. So what? --Notabene1 (talk) 18:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * If there are other pages that need attention, they can be dealt with individually. However, the state of other articles has no effect on this article. TN X Man  19:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I just try to explain. Try to listen. Most bands of this genre are not so popular to ALL world. But they are famous to this group of interested people.

By the way ALL psychobilly genre has few thousand fans only of ALL world. If there is page about genre - it can be examples of the bands. Most of bands are "non-notable" to other world. Let's stay page about genre without examples of bands? This band is popular into this genre. They crowd the consert halls - speaking about __this__genre and __their__fans. You know the rules of Wiki better and it's your decision, i just would like to be sure you're really understand what are you doing now. Small'fans'genre has small'popular (to all world) bands. Before writing i read many pages about other bands of this genre. And it's wrong: to stay the articles about really non-notable bands. --Notabene1 (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Fails WP:BAND. Eusebeus (talk) 19:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BAND. Bluecanary99 (talk) 20:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. With three albums on a fairly significant label that has released dozens of albums since 2003, there must surely be enough coverage around, although the best I found was this.--Michig (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.