Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodthorn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Sandstein  20:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Bloodthorn

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I hate doing this, but this article is extremely poor. It's written as a fan site and I am almost positive sections were just copied from their home page. Also, google searches turn up very little in sense of reliable sources. Fails notability guidelines. No sources or references to establish any notability. Filled with original research and unverifiable claims. Delete Undead Warrior (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, I cannot find any information to confirm the tours of Scandinavia Europe nor can I find information of them being at Wacken or Inferno. (Hole in the Sky came up with a few results, but a small set of concerts is not a notable event) Undead Warrior (talk) 15:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Well, the official Wacken site claims they were there. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment In fact, so does the Inferno site. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 19:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Per A7, so nominated, no assertion of significance or importance, no notability established. ukexpat (talk) 15:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Undead Warrior (talk) 15:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:MUSIC, multiple releases on the very notable Season of Mist. Sources should actually be relatively straightforward to track down. AfD is not clean-up. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Three reviews from Allmusic, and some/all of the following might count as reliable sources: , , . Album releases are on a sufficiently notable label (although it isn't mentioned in the article at present), so WP:MUSIC can be satisfied.--Michig (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability appears to be in order, but the article needs serious editing to get it into shape. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note--I've done some of this editing, but will leave the actual important stuff (sources, etc) for those who know this stuff better than me. Drmies (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep based on Michig's research of the subject. If kept, the article should be sent to an appropriate WikiProject for further cleanup. - Mgm|(talk) 18:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.