Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Desires


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Bloody Desires

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested Prod. Non-notable book. Violates crystal in that it is a "future" bestseller. GregJackP (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A future best seller whose author is presently 12 years old and doesn't quite grasp Wikipedia yet. Please be kind to the editor, who may need to be advised about putting too much information on the Internet.   Acroterion  (talk)  20:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, a clearly non-notable forthcoming book.  Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 20:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - "future" book. I have put in a nicely worded note in the author's talk page why we are deleting this --Sodabottle (talk) 08:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As per the previous comments, with a good luck wish to the "future" bestseller's young writer. Warrah (talk) 17:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The title sounds interesting.  If I were perusing the fiction section, I would probably be enticed to at least open the cover.  Chicken Wing (talk) 03:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Edward321 (talk) 15:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.