Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Lucifer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Tikiwont 09:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Bloody Lucifer

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page has no sources, and there are no hits for a graphic novel called "Bloody Lucifer" anywhere on Google. It seems to be bad fanfiction at best, vandalism at worst, and should thusly be removed from Wikipedia as quickly as possible. TheJoust (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Exorcise. The graphic novel, as the term is commonly used, didn't exist in the early 1800's, when this article claims it was written.  There were some interesting collections that could qualify, depending on what kinds of definitions you're using, but there's no way that the book described in this article existed in 1795.  This is just a terrible short story by someone who can't spell 'Martin,' disguised as an article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with FisherQueen, graphic novels didn't even exist in the 19th century. Chri$topher


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.