Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloody Mary (Lady Gaga song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Born This Way. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 19:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Bloody Mary (Lady Gaga song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSONGS first clause itself. There is no independent coverage outside album reviews and artist's own mouth. Article should be deleted, or at best kept as a plausible redirect to Born This Way, the parent album. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 06:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Born This Way per nomination. One-sentence passing mention in reliable sources doesn't contribute to notability.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Born This Way as this fails WP:NSONGS. One might think this is a plausible search term, but it definitely doesn't warrant a separate article either way. I don't know if people are really looking for this song when searching for the term "Bloody Mary", but one never really knows.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 13:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Has no notability, a redirect seems unjustified since almost anyone searching for "Bloody Mary" would want to be going elsewhere and who, realistically, is ever going to search for "Bloody Mary (Lady Gaga song)" Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 19:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Born This Way. Definitely a plausible search term, but its only justification under WP:NSONGS is that it charted at #1 in the Lebanon ("Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts"). Gnu andrew (talk) 21:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as per Tiptoethrutheminefield MarlovianPlough (talk) 03:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (gas)  @ 16:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Born This Way - As noted above it is a search term .– Davey 2010  •  (talk)  03:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Born This Way. No seperate article is needed because it fails WP:NSONGS.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  08:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Quick comment I have found some third-party sources (MTV News, NME, PopCrushPopDust) which could somehow help develop the article. Simon (talk) 03:46, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Out of those, HĐ, only NME gives sufficient coverage independent of album. MTV is from the words of a producer, which is not third-party. PopCrush and PopDust are also very unreliable.  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 05:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * And sadly the NME coverage is for Born This Way: The Remix not exactly about the original song. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 06:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.