Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloombase


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Bloombase

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks notability. There is basically nothing written about this company but press releases. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 10:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 18:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as largely PR, from the specific information about its services to then the specific information about the overall business and what it wants to say about itself, which goes to the sources too, containing this. This is PR and is not coming close at all for actual substance, let alone a convincing article. SwisterTwister   talk  01:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a client prospectus in the form of a Wiki article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.