Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomery Pike


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hog Farm Talk 13:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Bloomery Pike

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article is uncited. Doesn't provide any clear reason why this road name is notable relative to any of the other millions of named roads. Bitmapped (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: Can't help you on the sources, but it's notable. Major (at least for the counties it serves) east/west route in two counties that barely has any.  Sources shouldn't be too hard to find.  Maybe, instead of AfD'ing, you should try looking for them. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 14:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Now 5 sources (not by me), so pretty sourced now. :) -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 18:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - The sources which have been added are mere passing mentions in articles about other topics, not significant coverage that would meet WP:GEOROAD. The route is covered by West Virginia Route 29 and West Virginia Route 127, the alternate name does not necessitate a duplicate article. –dlthewave ☎ 01:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources just passing a mentions and not significant coverage about the subject. Brayan ocaner (talk) 00:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete—fails WP:GNG. The five sources are passing mentions, and thus they don't establish notability.  Imzadi 1979  →   02:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.