Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomfield Homes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Bloomfield Homes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is about a home building company which appears to be run of the mill; I haven't been able to find significant coverage of it in multiple, reliable sources to meet WP:N. The statistics given in the article (10th largest builder in Dallas metro area, 87th largest in the US) are not significant enough in my eyes to meet WP:ORG.  Them From  Space  23:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:13, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, no notability has been demonstrated in the article, the run-of-the-mill case indeed.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A normal firm going about its business - fine for a business directory, not for an encyclopaedia. Rankings cited in the article do not demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH notability and I'm not seeing anything else. AllyD (talk) 09:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.