Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blossöm Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Blossöm Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Typical promotional article.Non-independent and non-reliable sources. Winged Blades Godric 15:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - exactly how *not* to source a Record Label article. I couldn't find any reliable, independent sources.  Does not have a length of history or roster of notable artists, nor is there anything to indicate the label has had any discernible impact on musical or general culture.  Therefore fails NMUSIC#5 and GNG.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 16:42, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Seems like a personal emotional attack on the article, everything listed in the record labels article us current, accurate and professional. All current rostered artists are active, touring, syncing and publishing music content. The labels latest releases and collaborations included Chad Hugo, Ne-Yo, BJ The Chicago Kid, and Billie Eilish.

Am deeply concerned by the impact of this deletion prompt, and how to stop it. - Please advise, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaltrose (talk • contribs) 19:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP is not the Time's top ten songs, or Billboard's Top 100 or a social media for fan clubs or a place for record labels and artists to launch/promote their respective careers or new albums. I see no EV or innovation that has revolutionized an industry. Atsme 📞📧 00:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - references do not meet WP:RS and I think fails GNG. Deathlibrarian (talk) 09:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.