Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blossom (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 19:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Blossom (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I was unable to find significant coverage of this game in secondary reliable sources. Delete per WP:GNG. Article was created by a person working for the developer as stated on the upload. Odie5533 (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No apparent significant coverage in reliable sources. There is one independent source supplied in the article, but whether it is reliable or not we do require multiple independent sources to establish notability. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  20:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would have suggested redirecting to Braintonik but it seems that article suffers from notability issues and I plan to see if it meets AfD criteria. As for this game, Google News provided nothing and, honestly, there are thousands of mobile games, not all of them receive significant attention especially if independent. SwisterTwister   talk  00:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per nom. Deathlibrarian (talk) 14:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as not passing WP:GNG - no reliable, secondary sources found. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 14:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. –  Richard  BB  15:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.