Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blow Job (cocktail)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:45, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Blow Job (cocktail)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are lots of sources about what this is and how to make it. The only sentence in the article that goes beyond WP:NOTHOWTO is unsourced (although the sources that are in the article are both rather poor). Not seeing a stand-alone article here. Notability is also an issue given the sources I'm seeing are basically brief mentions or instructions rather than in-depth coverage. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 04:58, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk \\ 04:58, 25 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, no notability. Recipes being available as sources does not mean it deserves an article. Reywas92Talk 23:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. A lot of the articles at List of cocktails have a similar level of coverage. It is hard to know whether to nominate those, or whether the one poor ref here is sufficient. Szzuk (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Please do delete shit like Havana Cooler. I can't imagine someone complaining about a prod or bold redirect. It's a recipe, not something with actual coverage. Perhaps that list can be converted to a table/tables: columns for name, ingredients, notes, and sources, merging the stubs into it. Reywas92Talk 05:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.