Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BluGem Communications Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

BluGem Communications Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The company has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. All the sources in the article are affiliated with the subject. Finally, a search results mostly non-independent sources and company profiles. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * The article was updated taking into consideration the comments and guidelines from Wikipedia. There are no links to the company's website, many keywords in the article are linked to other wikipedia articles and all references are external to the company and are verifiable. Please contact me if there are any concerns. Sdose (talk) 13:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I have failed to find any significant mentions in reliable sources. Although Blugem Equity seems to pass WP:GNG, Blugem communications does not. The best source I could find was this trivial mention of them getting investment funds. Winner 42 Talk to me!  21:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing suggests that WP:ORGDEPTH criteria are met.--Rpclod (talk) 02:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and possibly draft - Searches at News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary only found some News results but nothing significant. SwisterTwister   talk  16:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete "sources" in the article are primary sources only, searches turn up directory entries and trivial mentions. Kraxler (talk) 18:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.