Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BluMJk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

BluMJk

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is written using promotional language, and note the use of the possessive term 'our' to describe a feature of the medication. The article contains unsourced claims that the product is 'unique', and repeatedly states that the action of the medication results in 'eliminating the sensation of pain', without any source to back this claim up. So far as I can tell, the medication is basically aspirin. As a topical medicine, it is unlikely to be as powerful as this article claims. Richard Cavell (talk) 02:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - no souerces provided our found in searching writing about the company. Article is also promotional. -- Whpq (talk) 03:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotional and unsourced. Medical articles on Wikipedia ought to be held to the highest standards of verifiability, especially when they offer medical advice. I see no reputable sources, and without those, I'm forced to conclude that this is a promotional page. TheFeds 03:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability has not been established. This is spam. - Boston (talk) 03:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--yeah, this is pretty blatant advertising. Drmies (talk) 05:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as blatant advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 18:01, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G11) — Spam. The only missing from the article is the ubiquitous "Ask your doctor if BluMJk is right for you." MuZemike  ( talk ) 18:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.