Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blu (Rio)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rio (2011 film). czar 19:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Blu (Rio)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article consists almost entirely of unencyclopedic plot summary. The character in question is not notable enough to warrant a separate article. Sro23 (talk) 08:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per WP:TNT. It's mostly unsourced, since the only reference provided addresses just the sequel; also, the level of detail is just excessive. The character is non-notable, and there really is nothing here that isn't written better in Rio (2011 film) and Rio 2. Parts of this article also seem to be copied directly from Rio 2. GABgab 19:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On 2nd thought, Redirect to Rio (2011 film). Works for me. GABgab 23:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Rio (2011 film) - The person responsible for expanding the article (Dinonick1) is possibly the same person as Dbocz1234, who also made insanely long summaries of movie characters such as Scrat and Manny (Ice Age) (the latter article Dinonick1 was involved in through this edit, thus raising my suspicions). The text in the section Rio 2 also seems to be copied from this youtube video's description (CopyVio Detector). SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 23:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rio (2011 film). The article is just plot summaries of the films, which makes it redundant to the existing articles, and the character is not notable enough on his own for a separate article. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 21:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.