Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluccleuch Scotch Beef

Looks like a gramatically sloppy advert. If it's deleted, the reference from the Beef page should be nixed too. 155.91.6.71 18:49, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * It's not only a mess, it's a misspelled mess. "Buccleuch Scotch Beef" gets 521 Google hits.  It might be worth keeping once it's held under the cleansing waters of the cleanup page. - Lucky 6.9 21:50, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's weird. The poorly spelled ad gets submitted by a person with a username, and listed for deletion by anon. Something ain't right about that. This guy also created Buccleuch Scotch beef (the correct spelling) as a separate article. Delete both. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 02:40, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Also recommend redirecting this guy's sub-stub Buccleuch to Duke of Buccleuch unless turned into a real article. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 02:42, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I have cleaned up and expanded the beef page to include other premium designations, leaving a link to Buccleuch Scotch Beef. I redirected Buccleuch to Duke of Buccleuch.  I also created a new link to the Buccleuch Group within this article.  I think an article about the Buccleuch Group should be written as I have found that it is headed by the largest private landowner in Great Britain.  My suggestion is that Buccleuch Scotch Beef should remain and be properly expanded and if not, at least redirected to the Buccleuch Group.  The misspelled version should certainly be deleted.  H2O 18:31, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a probable misspelling, content is already on the correctly spelled page. Andrewa 01:17, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)