Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bludhound


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Lobo (DC Comics). Spellcast (talk) 16:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Bludhound

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Extremely minor character, made only one appearance. Fails test for notability Konczewski (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Searching for 'lobo' and 'bludhound' does return some coverage but nothing substantial.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 07:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.  -- Hiding Talk 10:03, 22 November 2007 ( seriesUTC)
 * Delete as fails WP:FICT. It is a general consensus on Wikipedia that articles should not be split and split again into ever more minutiae of detail treatment, with each split normally lowering the level of notability. What this means is that while a comic may be notable, it is not normally advisable to have a separate article on a character from the comic. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lobo. Appreciate the concerns above, but feel that a redirection works better for all, as a potential search term as well as preserving history per the GFDL and encouraging participation in Wikipedia. Failing WP:FICT is somewhat meaningless, as the guideline is not a test articles have to take in order to stay, or that being deleted is the punishment for not meeting rough standards. Hiding Talk 10:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.