Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueMarine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

BlueMarine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software. Did a quick search and couldn't find any third-party, reliable coverage of it. Just seems like an open source project that has since been abandoned. Logan Talk Contributions 01:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment Quick searches won't turn up results for software that hasn't been developed in almost ten years. You have to dig deeper to find relevant info, e.g. here. Samsara 00:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 01:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Aside from the informative article by the software's author in the NetBeans Community Magazine and the usual download site link, searches are not turning up anything to indicate that this ever became notable. AllyD (talk) 19:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The only thing that brought this closer to me to GNG beyond what has been noted before is, but I doubt we'd actually include pull quotes from the views on the software given there. I don't think we really have met GNG here. --j⚛e deckertalk 03:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.