Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BluePay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

BluePay

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete non-notable company per WP:CORP very spammy, and referenced only from press releases Mayalld (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep company page. Per WP:CORP press release are valid secondary sources for references  Xastyanax (talk) 19:48, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Press releases are not secondary sources, they are primary sources. However, weak keep as what's there seems to establish notability. Stifle (talk) 19:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Press releases do not establish notability, because they are generated in-house.  This is a jargon laden article about a non-consumer tech services business. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The article itself isn't written in a terribly spammy fashion. I guess I have seen far worse, but there is nothing to indicate notability.  Have any legitimate business or tech publications profiled the firm?  I would suspect not.  Montco (talk) 06:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.