Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueSky Charter School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 13:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

BlueSky Charter School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not seem to be notable Chidgk1 (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Minnesota. AllyD (talk) 14:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. Gtgamer79 (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nomination. XAM2175  (T) 18:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 22:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Notability (organizations and companies) says: "All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations, the general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria." Sources  Articles from the St. Paul Pioneer Press:  The article notes: "The school is for grades seven through 12. It serves mostly at-risk students who don’t fit into typical school environments, but it also has accelerated learners. ... Enrollment at the school is expected to top 400 next year. That’s a 40 percent increase from last fall, but far from the nearly 700 students who attended the school before trouble began with the state Department of Education. The department started investigating BlueSky in 2009 after receiving complaints that the school was not meeting state curriculum standards. The inquiry dragged on, and the state tried repeatedly to close the school. The charter spent $200,000 defending itself. In the end, Education Commissioner Brenda Cassellius agreed with an administrative law judge that there was not enough evidence to close the school."   <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol></li> <li>Articles from the Star Tribune:<ol> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol></li> <li>Other articles:<ol> <li></li> <li></li> </ol></li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow BlueSky Charter School to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 08:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC) </li></ul> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 15:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * keep the controversy around the school means that it passes WP:SIGCOV with almost 30 newspaper articles in some of the most circulated newspapers in the state. --hroest 18:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - Cunard's research shows a clear GNG pass. 69.92.163.38 (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.