Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueTie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete per CSD G11. Nacon kantari 02:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

BlueTie

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable buisness. Users who edit it seem to be part of the company thus not following WP:COI. Article is written like a advertisement DBZROCKS 12:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Entry Modified While the entry was not intended to be an advertisment by any means, it was merely making a product comparison as the original header stated. In hopes to comply, we have removed the product comparison section completely. The information that is left pertains to the company history and current developments.  With regards to BlueTie not being a noteable business, there are 2 article links to major magazines with write-ups and critiques on BlueTie and its product. This article is no different than the wikipedias entries of their competitors such as Zimbra, etc.Jolynn0906 01:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)  01:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete under CSD G11. This is blatant advertising, they even list the advantages to upgrading the product. Also, there aren't any sources listed and no assertion of notability is made. -- Cy ru s      An dir on   12:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete As blatant advertising. -- St.daniel talk 22:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertisement and conflict of interest. --Czj 01:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.