Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Express Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. A7, No indication of significance. The conflict over just how to remove this articles seems unusual, but the simplest thing to do now is to just end it.  DGG ( talk ) 01:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Blue Express Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Speedy delete under A7: Article does not indicate why company is important or significant. (Sorry for bringing this to AfD, but another editor removed A7 for mistaken reasons, and I don't want to edit war over it.) —teb728 t c 09:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete one sentence stub. No indication of notability, no reliable sources found. --Lemnaminor (talk) 10:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete I can't even find any unreliable sources that discuss the company, let alone reliable ones. Nwlaw63 (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Not sure this company even exists. Google doesn't even find a unreliable reference for it. There is a Blue Express Inc, but that is Chinese. There is a facebook page for them here, filled with photoshopped images of skyscrapers and aircraft with their logo. I think this is all a hoax. JTdale   Talk 15:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per CSD G-3. There is very little evidence that the subject of the article exists. OK this is a bit of a mess and its partly my fault, mea culpa mea culpa mea maxima culpa. I removed the original CSD tag for three reasons (my edit summary got cut off). First because the article had only been in existence for about two minutes when it was tagged, secondly it appeared to be a case of WP:BITE, and lastly a single sentence blandly stating something exists does not constitute unambiguous advertising, a fact I embarrassingly did not note in my chopped summary. However, I failed to look deeply into the matter and after doing a search this morning it's fairly clear there is not a snowball's chance in hell that this will meet our standards. I also have to note user:Rajesh Kumar Adhwani Ji, who has a track record of creating dicey articles, is for some reason aggressively trying to interfere with this AfD. I suggest a Speedy Close. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Per WP:CSD - tagged as such. Dusti*Let's talk!* 20:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.