Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue LoLãn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems like the consensus is that while others have written about the topic, these writings do not establish notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Blue LoLãn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Proposal fails the requirements of WP:ANYBIO, WP:NMUSICIAN, WP:NCREATIVE - in that it doesn't demonstrate significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Noting that IMDb, Discogs and the individual's website are not acceptable, reliable or independent sources. Dan arndt (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a search failed to find any RS.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 12:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete The subject has been written about in multiple printed sources as well as Huffington Post article.György Tibor (talk) 16:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * In that case you should add them to the article!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete – The Huff Po article is a mention about her work with animals. The Uniqlo link is a passing mention. I was unable to find anything that would help her pass GNG at this time. Missvain (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails notability criteria for NARTIST and GNG. Netherzone (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.