Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Lotus Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedily deleted Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Blue Lotus Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

PR firm with limited notability. Article written as a promotional piece. NJA (t/ c)  14:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. No minimal claim of importance; this is an independent Indian public relations firm.  A PR firm that thinks having a Wikipedia article is a good idea: surprise, surprise, surprise! Unambiguous advertising to the point of complete bollocks: ...acclaimed for its knowledge based public relations.... keen to do something different from the rest of his colleagues.... working on a scientific approach to application of strategy in Public Relations. In this quest, Trust, came across the most fundamental attribute required for all other positive attributes to flourish..... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete CSD G11 would apply.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 15:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as WP:SPAM -Quartermaster (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete just a CV and company profile... no academic value —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.39.157.76 (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete WP:SPAM fo sho.  B.Rossow ·  talk  17:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Pile-on the spam wagon. Warrah (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.