Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Mountain Hospital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  06:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Blue Mountain Hospital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local hospital supported only by its own web-site. Mildly advertorial but with no trace of notability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 22:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 23:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 23:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I clipped some sources and put them on the talk page. More sources exist, just did two. I only searched for newspapers in Oregon.  Kees08  (Talk)   06:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to keep; the sources are there just need incorporated.  Kees08  (Talk)   03:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:02, 19 April 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 04:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 *  weak Delete Changed to Keep - may not pass WP:NHOSPITALS as no such sources included and hitherto none can point out sources in the criteria. By extension WP:GNG will not be met. Vote may change if someone give me good sources which henceforth there are none --Quek157 (talk) 16:52, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * In addition, no where to merge as information on the page is replicated at List_of_hospitals_in_Oregon and the page didn't give any significant (can be referenced) context. --Quek157 (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * As stated above, I put sources on the talk page, in case that sways you.  Kees08  (Talk)   17:09, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * do refer to talk page for admin (talk page for the article). The one cited in the main page is local press, I am solely base on the criteria, WP:NHOSPITALS, "A single author or publisher counts as only one source, regardless of the number of publications by this person. Routine coverage and passing mentions (such as "The victim was taken to E. Normous Medical Center" or "Dr Smith of Smallville Hospital, said...") do not count. Nearly all hospitals, regardless of size, and most medical clinics and related organizations will have been the subject of at least one in-depth article in their local newspaper. In practice, large, regional hospitals will almost always meet all of these standards, but some smaller hospitals and many clinics will not. Hospitals that do not meet all parts of this standard do not qualify for a stand-alone article, and should instead be described in a section on healthcare or emergency services in their hometown articles or parent organization, with suitable redirects from the hospital's name. Additionally, if the independent sources available to you would not permit you to write more than one or two paragraphs, then it may be preferable to add that information to a larger article, with appropriate redirects." Source 1 - Associated Press (AP), Source 2 - AP. Therefore based on the sentence, a single publisher counts as only one source, we have one independent source. For the one cited in the article,should not be counted as it is a primary source. Criteria 2 / 3 met but criteria 1 does not. One more source I will change to keep based on WP:NHOSPITALS. IMO, based on WP:GNG, I think it meet but since there is such a specific criteria (which a wikiproject had discussed in depth WikiProject_Hospitals, I see no reason to void. The entire article just need one other good (inserted:third party) source which cover in depth to save it, please find if can. I am never prone delete if you see my Afds. Sadly and regretbly so still weak delete. Quek157 (talk) 18:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * For admin, no need talk pages, sources I clipped here Clipped some sources for this:source 1 (Source 1) source 2 (Source 2). --Quek157 (talk) 18:58, 5 May 2018 (UTC) (Modified --Quek157 (talk) 19:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC))
 * I think I have covered your concerns now.  Kees08  (Talk)   21:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Please ping me, I don't have this on watch. Thanks a lot. Not my requirement but community ones, which are made via consensus. I also have articles which CSD tagged due to not meeting. Yes, I guess the one via Oregon county will finally meet criteron 1. Change vote to Keep via meeting WP:NHOSPITALS. --Quek157 (talk) 21:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC). Additional note: Ref 2 is what that swung my vote. A county source is not directly the hospital but do note that the hospital Board of Directors are elected by the county, but we shall not dig so deep as prima facie case of notablity is there. And jsut curious what is "large bore MRI machine".--Quek157 (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.