Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Tuna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 04:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Blue Tuna

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:CORP, due to no significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. The company does not appear to have done anything to make it notable, so significant independent coverage becomes vital for notability, and I can see none. Pepper Itch (talk) 00:24, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 01:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete – the company can definitely become notable in the future - but for now, it fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:08, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: another award-winning ... television, Corporate Video & multi-media production company. Non-neutral advertisement, and no showing that this business has had the sort of significant effect on history, technology, or culture to be remembered in an encyclopedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:16, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 06:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Subject not notable, and as such, fails WP:CORP; Ghits yield results about the fish, and there were only rare unreliable results about the company. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 22:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.