Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blundellsands & Crosby railway station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Close. No need to waste time on this. &mdash;Xezbeth 11:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Blundellsands &amp; Crosby railway station

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable railway station Sploooshman 09:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. This is one in a spree of nominations, many of them ridiculous in nature. Railway stations are important nodes in the transportation network as has been established countless times in the past. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * While larger stations and nodes are notable and deserving to be recognised in a comprehensive encyclopedia, smaller stations such as this with no historical, cultural, social or other significance with respect to transportation are not. As this station has no past or present achievements or any form of notoriety it does not pass notability guidelines and until it reaches these its deletion is justified. And please refrain from making personal attacks, I have raised this on your talk page. Sploooshman 09:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Pictogram voting keep.svg|18px]] Strong keep This article is about a notable railway station in England, I am struggling to see what other policies or guidelines the nominator believes this fails and why, the article needs some reliable references added however. The Sunshine Man 10:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. Although not a guideline or policy, consensus has been in the past that railway stations are all sufficiently notable. --Dhartung | Talk 10:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.