Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blunden Harbour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Blunden Harbour
The result was Speedy delete. CSD G12: copyvio. Mike Peel 21:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This subject does not meet WP:ATT. No significant third party coverage. Article looks like a promo by the distributor. Nv8200p talk 20:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G12 as a copyvio of . Leaving that aside, there are only 70 Ghits for the film name plus "Robert Gardner" - theser are commercial sites, not critical reviews, so it's not a notable film. Shalom Hello 03:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 12:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Shalom, tagged article as such. DMacks 16:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.