Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bnai Elim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, G12. A look at the Website noted by GRBerry confirms this article is a blatant cut-and-paste copyright violation. Blueboy96 21:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Bnai Elim

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declining speedy deletion because it's unlikely that a quick deletion will settle the matter. There's only one incidental mention of the organization at Google news archives, no independent sources, and nothing that clues me in where I would go to find an independent source establishing notability. - Dank (push to talk) 20:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 20:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 20:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 20:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under WP:CSD. As far as I can tell, every word on the page is copied from sub-pages of http://www.bnaielim.org/, partially the lead page, partially the facts page (which at their site is copied from http://www.middleeastfacts.com/middle-east-facts.php).  The whole thing is a copyright violation.  GRBerry 20:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.