Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Božidar Djurica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Božidar Djurica

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete as blatant advertising (WP:DEL4) violating WP:NOTPROMOTION ("must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery") in almost all of its content. The entire article is written from the topic's point of view and lacks any independent sources. In its current form the article only promotes the author's esoterical views and his books. The topic is also likely not notable (no promising Google hits). GermanJoe (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 21:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 21:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 21:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 21:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete page is mere PROMO for the originator of "LIFE-COSMIC ENERGY", a "theory" that is so far out there that it may not even merit being called WP:FRINGE. I cannot find anyone else writing about this "theory."E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, as the page in its current form (latest edit) appears to conform to the Neutral Point of View policy WP:NPOV and does not seem to violate in any way WP:NOTPROMOTION ("must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery") or contain any blatant advertising or PROMO:
 * 1)The page in its current form does not promote in any way the supposed 'views', 'opinions', 'claims' or 'theories' of the author, or seem to promote the author himself in any way, but simply to state that such author in fact HAD such and such 'view', 'theory' or MADE such and such 'claim', without in any way trying to promote such views and claims or to prove them as true;
 * 2)In it's current form the article seem to merely and solely provide biographical information about the author and the subject of his writings.
 * 3)Further or other writings about this 'theory' seem to exceed the scope of this page and discussion as the only statements made in regard is that the author wrote about such subject or had any such 'theory';
 * 4)The statements that the author MADE such claims or HAD such 'views' (wether true or not) are further backed with the relevant sources and citations (namely his own published written accounts), as are information about the person's life, hoewver part of these appear in foreign languages.
 * 5)I agree that ANY PREVIOUS VERSION of this page was not in conformity with WP:NPOV and WP:NOTPROMOTION, as well as lacking appropriate sources, however I repeat that in its latest version the content and purpose of the page clearly appears of esclusively biographical nature and neutral, and invite those so far in favour of deletion to revisit the page and its content and perhaps point out any still existing irregularity. In its current form I seem to only detect some revision of grammar and style, easily fixable without any need for deletion. Musashi1993 —Preceding undated comment added 12:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete-Nuke-able non-notable spamcruft. ~ Winged Blades Godric 11:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.