Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoP!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 18:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

BoP!

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:N WP:AD  - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs   00:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * This is a marginal case. If a verifiable reference or source were cited to back up the assertion that it is "a big hit is Scandanavia[,]" then it might be salvageable, but as the article stands now it does not appear to meet either verifiablity or notability standards so I would have to say: delete. OlenWhitaker (talk) 01:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment If the claims of the article can be proven by independent sources, keep.  If not, delete.  --    JT   Holla! 03:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into Ompagniet, the band. Although I'm not sure about the latter's notability either. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 04:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * HEY HEY HEY I always try to assume good faith, but a certain user deleted my vote! I say again, that this is shameless self-promotion and should be DELETED Beeblbrox (talk) 08:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs  17:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You are the nominator - please don't post your opinion twice, it makes it difficult to find consensus. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Sorry, on a different AfD I was told my nom vote didn't count because I didn't actually "vote" (again). I'll keep this double standard in mind in the future.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs  01:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It is generally considered that the nominator is automatically a "vote" for deletion unless stated otherwise. Feel free to contact me if you think someone else misinformed you, perhaps I can check it out & clear it up... &mdash; Scientizzle 18:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Another point--your use of "per nom" is confusing, as that actually means (in wiki-parlance) that you substantially agree with the statement provided by the nominator. If you had said "as nom" instead, it would have been clearer. &mdash; Scientizzle 19:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete unverifiable, possibly a hoax, definately qualifies under WP:NFT. --Jayron32. talk . contribs  17:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like a huge hoax, and is a self-confessed thing made up in school one day. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 21:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ompagniet - no notability on its own.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 21:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * A Big Delete is Scandinavia...i mean Delete. no verification of relationship with Ompagniet, no google hits, no news, even on the Swedish-language google, as both results there are to this article and a userpage, so no reliable sources found. A hoax.  Doc StrangeTelepathic Messages Strange Frequencies 23:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.