Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bo Diddley (Arvingarna song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv  🍁  15:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Bo Diddley (Arvingarna song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NSONG because it lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Appearing on the Swedish singles chart is not enough to make it notable. -- Calidum 15:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- Calidum  15:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - It is in fact notable per WP:NMUSIC section Recordings #1, #2 and #7. As a song in Melodifestivalen Swedens highest rated TV show as well. Sources are ok, but improvements can be done. AfD is however not a clean-up service.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:BabbaQ. 162 etc. (talk) 13:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Keep as stated above by User:BabbaQ and 162 etc.. J 1982 (talk) 12:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is closed as delete then I'd recommend reversing Talk:Bo Diddley (Bo Diddley song) since this would be the only notable song.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 07:35, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes criteria 1 of WP:NSONG as it charted in Sweden. Additionally, there is likely to be coverage in Swedish language media.4meter4 (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.