Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 03:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Boach

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

More neologism shenanigans. Oh, all of this AfD work is soooooo boach! Ecoleetage (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Belongs in Urban Dictionary not Wikipedia. --Quartermaster (talk) 17:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable protologism. &mdash; neuro(talk) 18:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not Urban Wiktionary.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary, and certainly not an urban dictionary. Fg2 (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete...this boaching boach of a boach. RockManQ  (talk) 22:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If that's not enough deletes, here's another one: Delete. Drmies (talk) 00:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Me too. Not even valid for a wp:dicdef.  P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 01:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — WP:DICDEF and WP:SNOW. MuZemike  ( talk ) 02:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. A dictionary definition that doesn't even bother to include a useful definition. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.