Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Shaheed Benazirabad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sourcing is insufficient for this to exist in mainspae, but the subject could be notable.. It's unclear whether someone wants to actively work on the draft but I have reverted the redirect so Draft:Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Shaheed Benazirabad will continue to exist vs. being deleted as G6. If no one ultimately wants to pursue that, it can be handled via G13 Star   Mississippi  15:33, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Shaheed Benazirabad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Shaheed Benazirabad

There is nothing in this article that attests to general notability. An article should speak for itself, and this article does not. There is already a draft, because the originator may be trying to overwhelm the system. This article can be deleted, and the draft can be kept. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fraternities and sororities, Schools,  and Pakistan. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:05, 26 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - Plenty of reliable news sources that confirm its existence as an educational board running under Government of Sindh:


 * 1) New BISE on the cards
 * 2) Shaheed Benazirabad: Sindh cabinet removes Dr Farooq as BISE chairman
 * 3) CHEATING THE SYSTEM
 * 4) Meeting about students’ scholarships tomorrow
 * 5) Person with dubious credentials appointed as VC
 * 6) Sindh changes timings for intermediate exams

Article written poorly shouldn't be the reason for its deletion. Insight 3 (talk) 10:10, 26 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Existence is not enough.  The article must meet the WP:NCORP guidelines which none of sources show.  For example, Meeting about students’ scholarships tomorrow does not mention BISE.  The 2nd and 5th sources above are about Farooq much more so than BISE and others do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. S0091 (talk) 20:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, in my view, the multiplicity of independent sources compensates the lack of in-depth coverage in individual reports. Also, the source Meeting about students’ scholarships tomorrow does mention the BISE.
 * There are also some Urdu news sources to consider:
 * Daily Jang
 * Nawai Waqt
 * As a non-commercial government institution, this educational board has coverage in the mainstream national newspapers, so it passes WP:NONPROFIT. Insight 3 (talk) 10:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Insight 3 I wonder if for some reason I am not getting the full articles from Dawn?  For 'Meeting about  students scholarships tomorrow', the body I see is only one sentence, "All chairmen of intermediate and matric boards of the province, including Hyderabad, Mirpurkhas, Shaheed Benazirabad, Sukkur and Larkana have been asked to attend the meeting with the concerning data from the students.", followed by Published in Dawn, April 20th, 2022.  However, there's no indication there is more. S0091 (talk) 17:52, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Educational boards are notable entities in Pakistan. Draft article is better than this and should be merged in it. Muneebll (talk) 13:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Sourcing consists of passing mentions in very short articles, mostly about other Boards. Fails significant coverage guideline of WP:GNG. Without other, more substantial sourcing, it's a case of WP:TOOSOON. — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.