Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Shaheed Benazirabad, Nawabshah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Shaheed Benazirabad, Nawabshah

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to meet notability standards, sources are all just press releases and one is a job listing. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 20:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 20:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Pakistan.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  21:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Ref 2 is borderline on providing SIGCOV, because it's really a story about other existing Boards being concerned about the creation of this one, but I couldn't find anything else after doing a search. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Educational boards being a government functionary are very much notable. There must be sources about it as they get regular press coverage whenever they announce results. Muneebll (talk) 14:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Muneebll "There must be sources", well where are they? Seawolf35 (talk - email) 20:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry if that came off as brash, but the sources are really not WP:SIGCOV, and also the subject's sources do not show that they meet WP:GNG. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 20:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Notable or not, what exactly are we learning about the organization from this article? That it exists and was formed in 2015?  I'm all for using stubs to get work on an article started, but the dearth of sources about this means that this will likely never grow beyond this empty stub, even if notability can be established. Owen&times;  &#9742;  16:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.