Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Board of Wikipedia editors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  T 04:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Board of Wikipedia editors
Very little content is provided as to what to this board actually does, this is just a proposal (Wikipedia is not a crystal ball) and Wikipedia is not meant for articles about itself, and its procedures in all its varieties. For these three reasons, delete. -- SoothingR(pour) 09:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't belong in the article namespace. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 12:29, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per all reasons listed above. Alternately, move to Wikipedia namespace and put through miscellany for deletion instead. Jacqui ★ 14:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki. Voyager640 21:55, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Why bother? Just delete Renata3 22:24, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Izehar 21:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - this kind of thing belongs on MetaWiki, or at minimum in a Wikipedia area. Its not notable for a general encyclopaedia article. Zordrac 12:21, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.