Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boarders

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 16:11, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Boarders
Unencyclopedic. There may be some information hiding in there, but it's unclear what it might be. Sounds like dictdef, if anything. Rl 22:19, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It requires notable evidence. Zzyzx11 00:16, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, circular dictionary definition. Megan1967 02:13, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.