Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boating Life


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Bonnier Corporation. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Boating Life

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I can't find significant coverage for this magazine. Joe Chill (talk) 05:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Without significant coverage, it can't be notable. Nyttend (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Bonnier Corporation. (I'll take care of the merge part.) Location (talk) 22:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge into a section in parent company's article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into the parent company's article (in fact the two lines already there are more than sufficient). No question of notability of parent company, but an ex-magazine can only be notable if it has left some important legacy on the world - and if had done that there would be secondary sources somewhere out there, but there aren't, so it isn't. --A1octopus (talk) 13:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge - if Location is willing to merge it, which seems appropriate, then I am all for it. Actually, I just I'd be all for it if anyone offered to do the actual merging.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  01:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.