Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Andrews (artist manager)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Only !delete vote sock of nominator. If a policy-based rationaile can be given for deletion no prejudice against renomination. The Bushranger One ping only 17:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Bob Andrews (artist manager)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Users highberry and Bob Andrews UTOW are both the subject of this article. Seems page was a vanity autobio and doesn't seem to be particularly notable. Jamminjimmy (talk) 21:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: Subject tried to remove afd template from page to artificially close debate. Jamminjimmy (talk) 23:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep notability claimed by multiple references and notable label. the user attempting to delete article has personal vendetta. Jamminjimmy joined wiki to harass people connected with someone he has personal and legal issues with. Not a good wiki citizen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.115.14 (talk • contribs)
 * As, the article was not deemed notable, only that there is a credible assertion that the label is notable. This discussion will determine if it is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. Additionally, please refrain from making personal comments about other editors.  Please stick to policy-based reasons for the article to remain on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:52, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * weak keep borderline notable, but does have a couple of in depth stories/interviews. Music articles are always tough to judge, because so many sources that show notability are more indie and not major NYTimes style outlets. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:08, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This is one of the few AfDs I have seen where subject of article creates his own autobio and then votes to keep it under his own named. Bob should be commended for his transparency but there is a tenuous claim of notability at best. Hackwayinteresting (talk) 02:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC) — Hackwayinteresting (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Note: user suggesting AfD and Hackwayinteresting blocked after SPI. Bob Andrews UTOW (talk) 18:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * note to closing admin I have striken the !vote of the nominator's sockpuppet per Sockpuppet_investigations/Jamminjimmy Gaijin42 (talk) 18:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.