Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Craig (ice hockey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Bob Craig (ice hockey)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails NHOCKEY and GNG. Clearly non notable minor league player. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:NHOCKEY. Quis separabit?  01:21, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - He narrowly misses NHOCKEY, but he seems to have gotten some coverage. Although his career ended more than 40 years ago, I was able to quickly find a couple of substantial articles about him: here and here. Given the length of time since he last played and the fact that these were easy to find, I have to believe there is more coverage that is less easy to find, but even this marginally meets GNG. Rlendog (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Rlendog: That's really stretching it. "Marginally"? Why do we have to clutter up Wikipedia with non-notables, encouraging further such article creations? Quis separabit?  21:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Typically, even curent minor leaguers who fail NHOCKEY also don't have multiple articles substantially about them. In this case we have a subject whose career ended 40 years ago, so most of his potential coverage won't be readily accessible.  But in this case there are 2 articles that I was able to find - which is significant coverage in multiple (at the lowest level of "multiple") reliable sources.  Normally, for a current minor leaguer I would want something more than this, but I'll settle for marginally meeting GNG for someone before the internet age.  I am not sure how this article is "cluttering up" Wikipedia.  Anyone who is not interested in him can easily avoid the article. Rlendog (talk) 01:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)


 * delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and some local typical sports reporting from his minor league career isn't enough to meet the GNG or every minor leaguer would be notable.Sandals1 (talk) 14:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete He does not meet notability guidelines for hockey players. All his notability would come from hockey so this is reason to delete the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:36, 27 January 2019
 * NHOCKEY is irrelevant for a subject that passes GNG. Rlendog (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:NHOCKEY....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * NHOCKEY is irrelevant for a subject that passes GNG. Rlendog (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.