Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Deutsch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  08:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Bob Deutsch

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject has many strong educational credentials but no really good indications of why he is notable. Links are mostly to personal sites. Student7 (talk) 23:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)




 * I see that he's been interviewed/quoted in several mainstream business books by other authors:, , , , , but I don't know if that's enough to meet the notability requirements. Couldn't find any scholarly articles with his research, it appears that he does private consulting work. OttawaAC (talk) 03:23, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The number of citations unearthed by OttawaAC is way below what we usually accept to show notability for academics. Does not seem to meet WP:PROF. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:34, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Unless he's written a book, he has no business being on Wikipedia. This is clearly an advertisement. Softlavender (talk) 05:23, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.