Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Fink (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Kurykh  00:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Bob Fink
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject does not seem to pass WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC or WP:PROF. Nearly everything stated is verifiable only with self-published sources (online from Fink's personal website, or in print published by Fink himself). He appears to have made some perhaps notable contributions to discussions about the bone found at the Divje Babe site (nothing published in peer-reviewed publications by himself, though), but this is mentioned at sufficient length in that article. EldKatt (Talk) 16:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Be aware that there is another musicologist (who seems far more notable and verifiable) named Robert Fink. This might make Google tests and such a bit difficult. EldKatt (Talk) 16:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The single use account editing makes this appear to be a vanity page. In any case, the subject is non-notable and the page lacks any content with non self-published sources. Bigdaddy1981 18:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think he's very notable. Within the scope of discussion on Divje Babe, his extraordinary claims about its origin make him notable there. I don't think this makes him a notable person on the whole though, and there are certainly more notable writers on that particular topic, and none of them have Wikipedia bios. Mr. Fink has one because he wrote it himself, basically. (Similarly he very heavily edited his theories into Divje Babe, which I still haven't taken the time to clean up.) - Rainwarrior 04:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.