Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Flag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Nineteen Eighty-Four (film). Redirecting on the suggestion from Mansford. Consider this a no consensus close with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Bob Flag

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non-notable actor, no evidence any role he played was subtantial (he only gave his likeness to Nineteen Eighty-Four) Hekerui (talk) 13:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Nineteen Eighty-Four (film) and mention the little bit of info here in the section about the cast. Notwithstanding that George Orwell's book is a classic, and that Big Brother is a central figure in the book, the film adaptation wasn't legendary.  Ironically, he's more visible than David Prowse was in Star Wars, having the advantage of being both seen and heard.  However, Michael Radford's 1984 was no Star Wars.  Mandsford 15:00, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment i disagree about the status of this film adaption, and i think others may as well. however, its obviously not as popular as other films from the time. Flag did star in a film, Cold Light of Day, a docu-drama about a british serial killer, which won a somewhat obscure award at the 1990 venice film festival. (the UCCA - Twenty Cities' Union Clubs Cinema Arci, or UCCA Venticittà Award). I am not sure if this establishes notability though. I am personally highly biased, as i loved the film 1984 and his image in it.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.