Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Garcia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Bob Garcia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet notability standards. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare  ‖ 17:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Creator also repeatedly removed deletion tags. Finally stopped after several warnings. -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders  ‖ 18:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Did they now. Seems to be gone again. Yvarta (talk) 18:38, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In a case like this do not hesitate with restoring the version prior to removal of the Afd template and give an edit summary like and issue the proper level Uw-afd on the user's talk page. If there are intermediate edits, try with Undo instead. Otherwise restore it manually. Done now. — Sam Sailor 19:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - Internet is slow or I would do a more complete search, but based on what I've found in perhaps 100 google hits, I'm leaning towards keep, based on coverage of his various mayoral activities., , , . So he might just yet pass the second number of WP:POLITICIAN, although not the first of course. Yvarta (talk) 18:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete mayor of a very small city, a status that does not confer notability. He lost a race to become the Democratic Party candidate for a congressional seat, but entering a party (primary, caucus - not sure which) does not confer notability.  I just scanned the first page of a news archive search, and all that I find is local coverage of these political activities which looks routine.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL as a non-notable local politician and WP:GNG too; the article is sourced to local news coverage. Sro23 (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - He's a small-town mayor getting some local press coverage. Nothing notable about that.Glendoremus (talk) 05:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. DeBary is not a large or prominent enough city to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability just for existing — but the sourcing here, which consists of two pieces of purely WP:ROUTINE local campaign coverage of the type that all mayors and mayoral candidates always get in their local media, is not good enough to make him more notable than the norm. Bearcat (talk) 17:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails gng, only routine coverage. Jacona (talk) 14:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per all the comments above regarding Clint P. Johnson.  caknuck °  needs to be running more often  04:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.