Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Harris (character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 05:58, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Bob Harris (character)
Redundant but unmergable with Lost in Translation; uncategorizable &hearts;&hearts;purpl  e  feltangel  &hearts;  &hearts;  01:58, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Delete That someone thought this worthy of it's own page baffles me!Coyote-37 13:56, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. As usual, no deletion required. If someone looks for this character, they will be redirected to the game. If not, then who cares? Trollderella 17:53, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge Not any real need for an article on its own, but a characters subsection in Lost in Translation itself couldn't hurt. Karmafist 18:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Seems mergeable to me. AndyJones 22:29, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Normally I would say merge, but looking at the Lost in Translation page it would be a bit difficult to merge it without messing with the fluidity of the page. This page can't get much bigger than it already is but I think (as a fan of the movie, so maybe I don't count) that it is at least slightly justified. There's no point in a character section of Lost in Translation because he's the only character with any notable history in the story. freshgavin  TALK   06:31, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Bill Murray got a Best Actor nomination for the character and, though he didn't win the Oscar, was the pick of most critics. Charlotte is really the only other significant character in the movie, so a character list, as per above, is not needed, and I definitely think that an article that focuses on him is at least worthy of a place on a page outside the main article. --Frag 05:26, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.