Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Lansberry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 01:42, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Bob Lansberry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Kooky personality, but not notable. Two links, but basically trivial info. – S. Rich (talk) 05:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC) • Amongst other things, this person was the subject of an award-winning documentary. That alone makes him a notable person, in my estimation. Jts3k (talk) 21:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)jts3k
 * I am the creator of this page and have added (and will add more) references on the notability of this Pittsburgh icon.Rp3h (talk) 20:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (say)  @ 21:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (intone)  @ 21:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (express)  @ 20:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * delete looks interesting, but not notable except maybe to locals Deunanknute (talk) 06:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to support notability. One article and obituary from the same source seems to be the only coverage in a reliable source.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  00:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - minimal, local coverage. He sounds like a colorful person, but there are millions of such people. Bearian (talk) 16:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.