Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Martin Petcare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Bob Martin Petcare

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant advertising. Tagged since October but no improvement made. Harry the Dog WOOF  14:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep – A company that holds in excess of 25% of the pet care industry in the UK, as shown here,, is pretty notable to me. Likewise, did you do a quick Google News search?  I was able to find multiple sources as shown here, .  Overall, I think it is a keeper.  ShoesssS Talk 14:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * See the article's talk page for a discussion on those "sources". It may well merit an article, but not an advert. Harry the Dog WOOF  15:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment – I see were you are coming from, not a problem. I’ll redo it tonight.  Take care. ShoesssS Talk 15:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep -- the article may not be the best possible, but it doesn't appear to be blatant advertising to me. It is an article that discusses a branded entity; information about the company's market share, history and leadership would improve it.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not seeing any promotional language in the current version and the basic difference since its nomination is the addition of references. It is a leading company and the reference backs it up --> notability established. - Mgm|(talk) 23:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.