Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Parr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  10:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Bob Parr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Page Bob Parr was speedy-delete-proposed by User:Morvoren6969 as, but he did not create the page, and several other people have worked on it, and it has many incoming links, and Bob Parr from the description looks somewhat noteworthy. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * So why but the page up for AfD then? Morvoren6969 did not create the page (as you say), so that user can't request Db-g7. Can I please suggest a speedy keep?  Schwede 66  09:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep' shouldn't even be nominated for AfD as no reason given. Meets all the appropriate criteria for notability. NealeFamily (talk) 10:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep as no proper reason given and meets notability standards.  J 947 (c)  20:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep as per emmys. I'll trim the article, however. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.