Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Ricci


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. If you wish to preserve the POV in amber somewhere, I'll copy that part of the text for you. Grand master  ka  04:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Bob Ricci
Vanity. Started and mostly written by Bob Ricci. Fails WP:MUSIC, I think. This might be the second nomination. cooki e caper (talk / contribs) 01:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: Unsigned, distributed by the website, and estimated fan base is not the same thing as sales estimates.  Parody artists have a lot of trouble, I know, and a lot of Dr. Demento sorts of artists can indeed have huge fan bases with no contract, but unless we have some method of verification, both WP:AUTO and WP:MUSIC apply.  Geogre 04:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Jared Hunt July 29, 2006, 06:39 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Amazon.com has his two albums for sale, and as much as I'd like to dismiss this article as vanity, there's no shortage of vain musical artists. Black-Velvet  07:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Vanity is not so much the issue, notability is. Fails WP:MUSIC for lacking charted albums, and not having multiple non-trivial articles written about him by third parties.  The fact that he has albums for sale does not lend itself to notability either, since anyone with a CD-burner can have an album for sale.  Tychocat 08:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom rootology 18:54, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I found third parties writting about this musician as part of the 3,430 ask.com hits.—— Eagle (ask me for help) 19:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Query: Did you add the information to the article and rewrite enough that voters should look again to re-evaluate their votes?  Geogre 20:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: No, I was merely doing some fact checking, if you would like me to do so, I will post the relevent sources to the talk page or this disscussion here. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 20:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I found the article interesting, and just what I was looking for. I see no reason for it to be deleted unless someone else has something better to put up first, and then it may as well just be editted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.39.202  (talk • contribs)  - first edit since November. BlueValour 02:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. The comment 'his exciting and funny live performances as well as his “ingenious and hilarious” lyrical compositions' should be preserved in amber in case anyone asks for an example of POV! BlueValour 02:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.