Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Sipe

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 13:30, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Bob Sipe
According to the article, " has not spent his time writing books and getting published, he should be considered one of the greatest thinkers of our time." I can't find any papers by him mentioned on Google, either. Seems to me he fails the "Average Professor Test". --Carnildo 08:05, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, he hasn't published, just being a professor and even head of a department does not make him notable, despite his "cult following". RickK 08:06, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, under the bar of notability. Megan1967 11:04, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, bad article. Gives the impression of a teacher only, and not at an establishment that appears to be particularly notable in that field (and a small university at that). Average Earthman 14:16, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete without verifiability - David Gerard 17:31, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete since should be and is are not synonyms. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 14:03, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not established. Vlad M V  &#1645; talk 02:48, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)