Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Smither


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was NO CONSENSUS. Possibly a merge if someone's feeling bold. -Splash - tk 23:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Bob Smither

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Failed Libertarian candidate in the 2006 election from Tom DeLay's old district. I'm was really surprised to see that this hadn't been through AfD last year. Third-party candidate, with few reliable sources: unclear to me whether he satisfies WP:BIO. Delete pending other opinions. Xoloz 18:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, why being a 'third-party' candidate matters? His candidacy got much press coverage, more than that of other 'second-party' candidates. --Uriel 18:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * And you have evidence of this, especially the latter claim? --Calton | Talk 07:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=bob.smither&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8 he even got interviewed for CNN, I don't think every single 'second-party' candidates got that far. And this anecdotal, but I live on the other side of the world, and I'm not from the USA, and I heard about his candidacy from the press. --Uriel 14:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. No claim of notability. He lost a political race. So have a lot of other non-notable people. --Fang Aili talk 18:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. This race received considerable public attention outside the geographical area, because of the unusual circumstances.  Smither is more notable than the average minor-party candidate.  Article needs cleanup, though. JamesMLane t c 03:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Whether politicians are notable depends on the individual circumstances, and the nature of the district and his distinctive views were widely reported. DGG 04:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge to Texas's United States House elections, 2006. His notability is derived from his presence in a particular notable campaign, not from anything that he actually accomplished.  By the proponents reckoning, any goober who managed to get on the ballot would be notable.  Montco 05:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or minor merge to Texas's United States House elections, 2006. No claim of notability other than he went from having a snowball's chance in Hell to a snowball's chance in a frying pan because of the special election. --Calton | Talk 07:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * He is notable even for non-politics related reasons, in the last month alone there are at least three news items that mention him in relation to the search of his daughter: http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=bob.smither&btnG=Search+News
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.